12 years old), which is actually quite illegal.”. De linke weekendbijlage (17-2020) - Kloptdatwel? Vidéo - Pr Raoult : "Les mesures sociales qui sont prises pour contrôler l'épidémie n'ont pas d'effet sur le coronavirus" These variables represent the cases reported by respective health authorities based on medical records and are independent of the number of tests performed. 100% wrong. Is Frontiers a potential predatory publisher? I think it’s better to focus on the serious flaws of Rauolt’s ‘studies.’ And if we want to talk about undermining credibility with extreme polemic personal attacks, we should look at what Raoult is doing and has done for years against detractors. You want to use it as early as possible, so it has a better chance of killing fewer bad guys to be successful. Donc, c’est pas vrai, c’est de l’intox, c’est pas vrai et ça disparaîtra comme c’est apparu il y a une vingtaine d’année, c’est de l’intox, je vous suggère d’ailleurs plutôt que… vous avez qu’à le lire car c’est intelligent, sur la version de wikipedia en anglais, vous avez qu’à lire, vous verrez qu’il y a la moité qui dit “voilà il faut faire des essais randomisés” et l’autre moitié qui dit “voilà pourquoi il ne faut pas en faire” et vous verrez que je ne suis pas isolé dans ce monde et que d’ailleurs tous les gens qui ont critiqués ça, je le redit, d’ailleurs et il faut le lire et il faut écouter ce que je dit, tous les gens qui ont critiqué ça n’ont publié que des essais comparatifs non randomisés, il n’y a pas un essai français randomisé comparatif, il n’y a pas même un essai français qui ait le degrée d’isolement des stratégies thérapeutique comme le notre, zéro. The treatment costs nothing and this is what is annoying them all!!!! Where these numbers are coming from ? Put the PNG version through level sweep analysis, and it shows blocky halos around pasted-in elements, including text, bands and lanes. Like these copy-pasted disease-spreading ticks, or these copy-pasted fraud-spreading gel bands, newly discovered at IHU: P Renesto, P Dehoux, E Gouin, L Touqui, P Cossart, D Raoult Identification and Characterization of a Phospholipase D–Superfamily Gene in Rickettsiae J Infect Dis (2003) doi: 10.1086/379080 Also “lanes two and three show concerning similarities.“. And anyway, Raoult and his colleagues “deemed it ethically unacceptable to conduct a therapeutic trial“. Once again minors cannot be included in a study unless they cannot be replaced by adults. 0,4% death rate. Macchiarini’s trachea transplant patients: the full list, these copy-pasted disease-spreading ticks, Identification and Characterization of a Phospholipase D–Superfamily Gene in Rickettsiae, denounce the report as fake news and a prank, https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Hydroxychloroquine_final_DOI_IJAA.pdf, https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/cases-2019-ncov-eueea, https://hal-pasteur.archives-ouvertes.fr/pasteur-02548181/document, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00_vy-f22nE, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuE5CA6yB-Y, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006072665&idArticle=LEGIARTI000025457542, https://health.ucdavis.edu/coronavirus/coronavirus-testing.html, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0536. I don’t think there is any such place. https://t.co/j6XIANLKHz pic.twitter.com/K0hFEHserc. Independent Science Journalist and Cartoonist. Its clearly to early to use data and studies. “You would fall for the same scam” is hardly a conclusive argument. It worked. Where did you hear that? Wow ! Le professeur Didier Raoult s'est plaint d'avoir vu l'une de ses vidéos hebdomadaires supprimée temporairement par la plateforme de vidéos américaines. Didier RAOULT, l'IHU est un pôle mondial dans le domaine des maladies infectieuses If you download the original Renesto et al. à partir de people were buying plaquenil in tons from the drugstore. Avec "La Provence" ce mardi : métiers d'art, un patrimoine toujours vivant ! The paper, published on 14 April, concludes against the use of hydroxychloroquine on COVID-19 hypoxic pneumonia patients and mentions: “Eight patients receiving HCQ (9.5%) experienced electrocardiogram modifications requiring HCQ discontinuation.“. You therefore have nothing scientifical in your approach as well. The French newspaper Entreprendre cited his letter to Robert Lafont, the CEO of this publishing house. In one patient, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were discontinued after 4 days because of a prolongation of the QT interval from 405 ms before treatment to 460 and 470 ms under the combination. Science journalism by Leonid Schneider, on research integrity and academic publishing in life sciences and biomedicine. ), which was never published anywhere, not even as preprint. You undermine your credibility with your extreme polemic personal attacks. Very serious,very,very serious .Stay “independent Cartoonist ” . As a reminder IFR = deaths / all infections (including the asymptomatics, undiagnosed etc.). So now Raoult endorses Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) as a chloroquine adjuvant. La vidéo a été réuploadée par France Soir, vous pouvez la voir à ce lien : sur France Soir n ous allons rapidement la télécharger sur de nouvelles plateformes d’hébergement « . The ones that are border-line are the one insulting a peer on a emotional basis, even sending death threats to him. Learn how your comment data is processed. My point is the timing of treatment is really big deal. On 20 April 2020, news came of Raoult being in serious legal trouble with the French authorities because of his human experiments with chloroquine: “The National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM), which did not authorize the second study on hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil *, Sanofi) conducted at the institute hospital-university (IHU) in Marseille by Pr Didier Raoult, awaits that the investigators bring objective elements to demonstrate its observational nature, indicated Dominique Martin in an interview with APMnews.”. Making huge profit out of this crisis by big pharma and their corrupted allies is the sole motive! just published a couple of days ago. That would be apples and oranges. That’s magic ! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1u7bETd3q9QVfO6y54jm_7Z5ZHTmoguUAetJHc2gwcj0/edit?usp=sharing. Tide is turning for the media-savvy French professor Didier Raoult and his chloroquine, even US President Donald Trump is suddenly barely even mentioning the miracle drug for COVID-19. ?Entre le pre-print est l'article publié, l'IHU a complètement revu la partie sur le comité d'éthique dans la première observationnelle. Pubmed as data on the Chinese invitro study of chloroquine. Because of Raoult, chloroquine became standard COVID-19 therapy in many countries worldwide. US rightwing politicians use this as a deliberate tactic. A retrospective study on 84 patients receiving hydroxychloroquine and azithromycine from New York University (Chorin et al medRxiv 2020) also demonstrated how serious those side effects in COVID-19 patients can be: “We report the change in the QT interval in 84 adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with Hydroxychloroquine/Azithromycin combination. Le fait, pour toute personne, de présenter à LaProvence.com un contenu ou activité comme illicite dans le but d'en obtenir le retrait ou d'en faire cesser He treated older patients who had clear symptoms, and few were subsequently hospitalized and almost none died. After dealing with Bik, Raoult tweeted his criticism about a study by his French colleagues in Paris and their study Mahevas et al medRxiv 2020. Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. The manuscript lists these key words: “SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; hydroxychloroquine; azithromycin; ethics; Hippocratic oath“. This horrendous ethics breach passed peer review at Elsevier with flying colours. I really don’t get this argument that “urgency of the situation excuses some of it”. Childs are going to be tested as well in a case of a pandemic, remember, we have to heal the people. Mais je peux vous dire et il faut arrêter, il faut regarder les livres médicaux, il faut regarder en maladies infectieuses combien il y a d’essais… combien il y a de thérapeutique qui sont utilisés actuellement qui ont été basées sur des essais randomisés et vous verrez, il y en a pas beaucoup et le peu qu’il y a étés en particulier pour le Sida et étaient totalement inutile parce qu’il suffisait de faire des charges virales. Now, the preprint by the Tongji cardiologist Wang Daowen and colleagues claims all 568 patients received “baseline treatments [..] of antiviral drugs (Lopinavir and Ritonavir, Entecavir hydrate, or Ribavirin)“. Les champs marqués d'un « * » sont obligatoires. Removing "death" from primary outcome is a surprising decision.https://t.co/ZnK9LiUzaX pic.twitter.com/Rq47FHqGyO. In that same video, Raoult is saying things which make less and less sense: “Maybe I was capable of responding to this situation because I’m part African and part of my ancestry leave me with the idea that we should treat infectious diseases“, Source: IHU Méditerranée-Infection – La leçon des épidémies courtes – 21 avril 2020 (https://t.co/s1D8zsWw53)@schneiderleonid @MicrobiomDigest @gorskon @Dereklowe @fxcoudertMore translation with more context and timestamps: pic.twitter.com/FrQKtQXTY0. Incidentally, by leaving France and Europe, he would escape any eventual criminal charges for illegal human experimentation. You mean BFM TV let people think he was a visionary. Practically, every country in the world monitors a number of active cases and death associated with COVID-19, and these statistics are updated several times daily. C’est que des gens qui dans les hôpitaux ont traités un peu comme ils voulaient qui a la fin on dit “regardez comment on compare”, donc il faut pas mettre les choses à l’envers, j’étais avant un grand scientifique et je suis resté un grand scientifique après avoir publié ça. In 1 day. Millions of people have been taking this drug for malaria in the past decades. Unlike his own clinical trials, Mahevas et al was really an observational study of 181 French COVID-19 patients treated after Raoult’s method, but with a control group. Bik blogged about that Brazilian “study”, where 636 patients, distance-assessed by telemedicine only, themselves decided which drug to take after they self-diagnosed themselves with COVID-19 (sic!). Instead, he lets his loyal bootlickers attack his critics. Ok, you don’t like the guy..you don’t like Trump…but it’s working, doctors have started using it and this pile of excrement you have written here will be forgoten and so will you! Not the one done by his US peers in the Veterans Affairs hospitals, that was a “fraudulent” and “fake news”. Well almost everything. study by a Brazilian insurance (sic! Its all the same. You mentioned above at ” Given the evidence that the coronavirus is apparently lethal for less than 1% of the infected……”. Politicians asking for an immediate solution to get people back to work asap in addition to damaged health systems in many countries, including the richest, already play a strongly negative role. This is not true. President’s Award for Outstanding Creative Activity, The Monsanto Papers: a wrong book on glyphosate, Towards equal opportunity for prostate, breast and ovarian cancers, Didier Raoult fraud: "Je ne regrette rien", Paolo Macchiarini indicted for aggravated assault in Sweden, Chloroquine genius Didier Raoult to save the world from COVID-19. That’s the difference here. He tweeted his YouTube video, saying that he prefers to have his studies assessed by “confined people” at his institute than by some external reviewers he cannot control: "Je reçois beaucoup de mails qui analysent les données disponibles, parfois de manière beaucoup plus profonde et professionnelle que dans les journaux scientifiques. Now Raoult, the 1-hour-peer review man, suddenly has enough of the traditional publishing he constantly games. The blame for thousands, if not millions, of covid-19 deaths will soon become abundantly clear being laid upon these two groups of ideoligists referenced above. Dirigé par le Pr. If you treat shingles after 48 hours Valcyclovir is not effective. see page 22 for data on patients (two 10 y/o children were included in the study) Read full articles, watch videos, browse thousands of titles and more on the "Didier Raoult" topic with Google News. Look at the data please. Since you seem French, you understand every word of what is sung by the students in the students’ performance video. Thats a big fat lie… only in marseille France were people were treated with chloroquine the rate of deaths was the lowest in France almost 0, people didn’t die in marseille were Dr Raoult treated them, but in rest of France they did and in marseille there is also no more new infections, the same in Greece, they also use the protocol and are fine, this article is just nonsense, it’s harassment and because of those bad articles people were miss informed and didn’t get treated. Wow… from the moment you confuse cloroquine with hydroxycloroquine, everything you have written becomes invalid. And what now? Raoult says this is good science. Raoult’s follow up clinical trial with 80 patients treated with chloroquine and azithromycine and without any control arm (criticised by Bik above) was published in a different Elsevier journal, and accepted the next day after submission. If you naively think such institutional fraud accusations happen in the scientific community at least occasionally: not really. You have many valid points against Raoult methodologies, although the urgency of the situation excuses some of it. Can you deny this man is so hated that students who do not have a carrier yet are not afraid to go public on what it means to work in his institute? But what about the treatment itself? Where the extra 158 patients and the HCQ group came from, is anyone’s guess, unless invented they were borrowed from different trials or hospitals. Dear Owlbert, please share your visual analysis! In 14 patients with paired samples, respiratory secretion at day 4 was negative in only one patient.”. Really, he does: First paper showing a significant effect of hydroxychloroquine on the fatality rate of severe forms of COVID-19.Attenuation of the inflammatory cytokine storm? Given the evidence that the coronavirus is apparently lethal for less than 1% of the infected, you can see where this is going. HCQ works. He also teaches infectious diseases in the Faculty of Medicine of Aix-Marseille University. Connectez-vous pour réagir à cet article. Scientists generally understand that and it is acceptable in urgent situations. Vladimir Poutine s'autorise à faire deux mandats de plus, Contrôle Covid à Marseille : "La pinte la plus chère de tous les temps", Une Marseillaise nous fera entrer chez Gainsbourg. Outside of Raoult’s alternative reality, clinical data from France, Sweden, Brazil and USA already now shows that chloroquine not only does not work against COVID-19, it seems to even kill. Raoult doesn’t talk about that study. He namely attacked the data integrity expert Elisabeth Bik, on Twitter and in full Trump manner: The witchhunter @MicrobiomDigest is not attentive to details when she judges that a study is useful to her paranoiac fights! Novartis to sponsor large-scale clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized COVID-19 patients #COVID19 #coronavirus #NovartisNews. ISAC (and then the publisher Elsevier) insist however that the peer review process “did adhere to the industry’s peer review rules.” Which is strange, since it seems the paper was reviewed and sent back for minor revision on the same day it was submitted. No wonder that the grand old man, unused to being contradicted or ridiculed, is losing it. 25/02/2020 – “Before we can influence mortality statistics in France, things will have to change a lot” in his “Coronavirus: a risk of pandemic?” video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuE5CA6yB-Y), I could also quote him on his “visions” about the climate but it’s out of his scope of proficiency. The first author of the new Gautret et al TMID 2020, Philippe Gautret, is incidentally associate editor of that of that journal. Raoult is right. We need to prevent the Cytokine storm. Those which do not fit his general world view, are all flawed or outright fraudulent. source : https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Hydroxychloroquine_final_DOI_IJAA.pdf It cannot be “quite illegal”. I look forward to seeing their paper once it is published. In many countries, the mortality rate is >10%, This is lethality and not mortality, so learn first and talk later. but why, oh why, you didn’t make clinical trial worthy of its name from the start, that could answer permanently Yes or No, the HCQ has effects, why did you keep in your niche paper … I know all your studies on Rickettsies, I know all your studies on maxivirus etc so I know your science well established, you knew very well that by publishing those “pseudo” trial, “pseudo clinical trial”, there were not acceptable by anyone, when we end up on a publication with 6 patients (he had 23, perhaps 6 in one group), we know very well that this i not a clinical trial, so why did you not do this clinical trial, it all bothers us” … You can see where it’s going”, The answer, I’ll let you translate it yourself though google, this is the word for word answer of Raoult on why he didn’t do a “clinical trial worthy of its name”: (added words to ease translation in parenthesis). https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202005.0057/v1, “It should be noted that while Raoult’s IHU hospital in Marseille boasts a very low COVID-19 mortality rate of 1.7% (while refusing to treat the very ill) it is still higher than the estimate for the rest of France which is 0.53% according to this study from Institut Pasteur. And Raoult is completely right. One in Italy tweeted yesterday that only 20 patients out of 65,000 users contracted Covid in Italy. About Dr Barraud alias fluidloading (which never denied to be Dr Barraud), here is most of his attacks on Pr Raoult, look at this link, http://www.noelshack.com/2020-17-3-1587558555-r-barraud.png. This is why chloroquine proponents changed their stance and now scream that it is wrong to treat very sick COVID-19 patients with chloroquine. The side effects of HCQ are ridiculous. The retrospective controlled clinical study found out that hydroxychloroquine-treated patients had a high risk of death and concluded: “In this study, we found no evidence that use of hydroxychloroquine, either with or without azithromycin, reduced the risk of mechanical ventilation in patients hospitalized with Covid-19. And in the last study, he had 8 deaths out of 1061 patients, 0.75% is a bit more but it included 474 co-morbidities, you can’t tell that it’s only the easy cases. Somehow Raoult’s Marseille buddy Jean-Paul Moatti managed to smuggle an opinion piece into The Lancet promoting chloroquine. Astounding, right? On 14 April 2020, Raoult’s IHU Marseille openly and publicly threatened a clinician Damien Barraud, who has been very critical of their chloroquine “studies” on Twitter and in newspaper interviews. If somebody has a hint that something might be working based on observation, then it should be presented that way. When you spend so much time admiring Trump, you start sounding like your idol. This medicin is approved for people with lupus and reuma. C’est en tout cas ce qu’affirme Didier Raoult dans un entretien avec la chaîne de télévision i24NEWS. Have you read Dr. Magagnoli et al’s study on outcomes of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 patients in the VA and checked whether Dr. Raoult’s criticisms of it are valid? 7 were here. When the time comes to discuss research financing, what will the taxpayers remember of that story? HCQ works like Tamiflu for the flu. Abonnez-vous I took it. Not a fan of Raoult at all but it is unfair to compare the mortality rate in his studies to the estimated infection fatality rate (0.53%) as the latter is necessarily much lower. Control group was treated with azithromycin.Nearly dying patients with lymphopenia were treated with hydroxychloroquine.Fraudulent study. As it happened, Raoult’s most recent (literally) uncontrolled clinical trials were ethically approved by his own submissive IHU. And while we’re at it, the author doesn’t seem to understand that chloroquine is not the same as HCQ. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Unfortunately a (supposed) lie can’t be fought with another lie, but with the truth. The highest level of evidence is Raoult’s own Gautret et al IJAA 2020 paper, plus two studies from China which don’t even fit. Fake news. see page 6 for inclusion criteria : “two primary criteria: i) age >12 years;” Do check the references here. Meanwhile, in USA, an NIH Expert Panel, convened by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (directed by US epidemics expert Anthony Fauci), recommended in its COVID-19 guidelines on 21 April 2020: “Except in the context of a clinical trial, the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) recommends against the use of the following drugs for the treatment of COVID-19: – The combination of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (AIII) because of the potential for toxicities.”. There are many other errors in your paper, dear Leonid. He even treated 14 year old children with chloroquine as part of his 1000 patients trial (Table 1 here, recruitment age was >12 years old), which is actually quite illegal. You need to use Tamiflu withing 48 hours of your influenza infection or else it is useless. Citizens For Responsible Care and Research (CIRCARE), Follow For Better Science on WordPress.com. 🔔 Go to the IHU Mediterranean Infection YouTube channel to watch the latest scientific bulletin from Pr Raoult. Raoult was possibly made to resign his job, he was cited to go to China already this summer. Predictably so, since the drug’s side effects are well known. Découvrez nos offres, Aix : leur métier, nettoyeurs... de scènes de crime. The description in the Table doesn't fit with a severe ARDS as only 1/2 patients were on mechanical ventilation ???? Regarding the Mahevas study in Medrxiv.Could the authors explain why 8 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine were counted in the control group? In this double-blinded phase IIb clinical trial, all patients were treated just as Raoult says, with hydroxychloroquine+azithromycine only, without those evil controls Raoult hates? Partir La-bas Karaoke, Musique Film Lamour C'est Mieux à Deux, Girondins De Bordeaux En Direct, Serge Moati Odette Moati, Ol - Asse Historique, You And I Lyrics Delegation, Dream On Guitare Acoustique, Killing Eve Saison 4 2021, Isabelle Adjani Famille, " />

pr raoult sur you tube

pr raoult sur you tube

Posté à h dans Uncategorized par 0 Commentaires

Despicable manipulation. Citations d'un des plus grands chefs militaires de l'histoire de France : le Maréchal Ferdinand Foch. “The high dose CQ arm presented more QTc>500ms (25%), and a trend toward higher lethality (17%) than the lower dosage. In a few short weeks, the controversial microbiologist has become France's best-known doctor after announcing the coronavirus "endgame" on YouTube. Is the inventor of chloroquine cure for COVID-19, the French microbiologist Didier Raoult, sane? Are you saying that Raoult is a fraud, Zelenko is a fraud, South Dakota is a fraud, the country of Bahrain is a fraud, along with 1000’s of doctors around the world? They gave all patients that were in the most critical state HCQ and then they conclude that HCQ increases deaths. IHU seems to have evolved under Raoult’s leadership into a lunatic asylum for the criminally insane. : I agree that in Raoul’s treatment, HQ is probably a wrong way and AZ is perhap’s doing all the Job, but Raoult is not only HQ. So continue your “better science” while they save people. At the moment we don’t have any treatment that is efficient for covid-19. Please either reference the law that was broken and explain how (which would be really valuable info), or delete that line. Bulletin d'informations scientifiques - Nous avons le droit d'être intelligents ! I have and conclude Dr. Raoult’s rightly points out its serious flaws. Bik found even more irregularities in his papers, which makes sense: a bullying and totalitarian research environment with a personality cult, where compliance and fear rule, can only produce unreliable or falsified research. 12 deaths over 3000 people treated. The safest way to successfully heal with witchdoctor magic is to treat those who are not really ill and recover anyway. See Salje et al (2020): Estimating the burden of SARS-CoV-2 in France Could Anthony Fauci explain why the investigators of the NIAID remdesivir trial did change the primary outcome during the course of the project (16th April)? Seen from France he was a visionary that refuse this stupid general confinement and that very early asker fot the TTT’s way of the South Korea. Will be better for all of us dear Mr.Nobody. The reference is to a new preprint from Tongji Hospital in Wuhan, China, Yu et al medRxiv 2020. Since Covid appears to rapidly deplete Zinc as well as other nutrients like Vitamins C and D3, Dr. Vladimir Zelenco has apparently had success by combining HCQ, zinc and Azithromycin for out-patient use. Both withdrew in 2018, after Raoult proved a despotic tyrant who allowed sexual harassment, discrimination and bullying to happen in his institute (read more here). On 24 April IHU retorted that the study never needed any ethics approval or patient consent, because it was “retrospective”, a hair-raising argument their Italian colleagues routinely used to cover up intentional patient abuse. I can’t insert graphics here. Philippe Parola par Sonia Mabrouk sur CNEWS Confinement, Ski et Vaccin. It is only available as document on the file sharing platform Dropbox (sic! The signs that Raoult might be losing his mind are already there. Pr Perronne, auteur de “Il y a t-il une erreur qu’ILS n’ont pas commise” au micro d'André Bercoff sur Sud Radio “He even treated 14 year old children with chloroquine as part of his 1000 patients trial (Table 1 here, recruitment age was >12 years old), which is actually quite illegal.”. De linke weekendbijlage (17-2020) - Kloptdatwel? Vidéo - Pr Raoult : "Les mesures sociales qui sont prises pour contrôler l'épidémie n'ont pas d'effet sur le coronavirus" These variables represent the cases reported by respective health authorities based on medical records and are independent of the number of tests performed. 100% wrong. Is Frontiers a potential predatory publisher? I think it’s better to focus on the serious flaws of Rauolt’s ‘studies.’ And if we want to talk about undermining credibility with extreme polemic personal attacks, we should look at what Raoult is doing and has done for years against detractors. You want to use it as early as possible, so it has a better chance of killing fewer bad guys to be successful. Donc, c’est pas vrai, c’est de l’intox, c’est pas vrai et ça disparaîtra comme c’est apparu il y a une vingtaine d’année, c’est de l’intox, je vous suggère d’ailleurs plutôt que… vous avez qu’à le lire car c’est intelligent, sur la version de wikipedia en anglais, vous avez qu’à lire, vous verrez qu’il y a la moité qui dit “voilà il faut faire des essais randomisés” et l’autre moitié qui dit “voilà pourquoi il ne faut pas en faire” et vous verrez que je ne suis pas isolé dans ce monde et que d’ailleurs tous les gens qui ont critiqués ça, je le redit, d’ailleurs et il faut le lire et il faut écouter ce que je dit, tous les gens qui ont critiqué ça n’ont publié que des essais comparatifs non randomisés, il n’y a pas un essai français randomisé comparatif, il n’y a pas même un essai français qui ait le degrée d’isolement des stratégies thérapeutique comme le notre, zéro. The treatment costs nothing and this is what is annoying them all!!!! Where these numbers are coming from ? Put the PNG version through level sweep analysis, and it shows blocky halos around pasted-in elements, including text, bands and lanes. Like these copy-pasted disease-spreading ticks, or these copy-pasted fraud-spreading gel bands, newly discovered at IHU: P Renesto, P Dehoux, E Gouin, L Touqui, P Cossart, D Raoult Identification and Characterization of a Phospholipase D–Superfamily Gene in Rickettsiae J Infect Dis (2003) doi: 10.1086/379080 Also “lanes two and three show concerning similarities.“. And anyway, Raoult and his colleagues “deemed it ethically unacceptable to conduct a therapeutic trial“. Once again minors cannot be included in a study unless they cannot be replaced by adults. 0,4% death rate. Macchiarini’s trachea transplant patients: the full list, these copy-pasted disease-spreading ticks, Identification and Characterization of a Phospholipase D–Superfamily Gene in Rickettsiae, denounce the report as fake news and a prank, https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Hydroxychloroquine_final_DOI_IJAA.pdf, https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/cases-2019-ncov-eueea, https://hal-pasteur.archives-ouvertes.fr/pasteur-02548181/document, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00_vy-f22nE, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuE5CA6yB-Y, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006072665&idArticle=LEGIARTI000025457542, https://health.ucdavis.edu/coronavirus/coronavirus-testing.html, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0536. I don’t think there is any such place. https://t.co/j6XIANLKHz pic.twitter.com/K0hFEHserc. Independent Science Journalist and Cartoonist. Its clearly to early to use data and studies. “You would fall for the same scam” is hardly a conclusive argument. It worked. Where did you hear that? Wow ! Le professeur Didier Raoult s'est plaint d'avoir vu l'une de ses vidéos hebdomadaires supprimée temporairement par la plateforme de vidéos américaines. Didier RAOULT, l'IHU est un pôle mondial dans le domaine des maladies infectieuses If you download the original Renesto et al. à partir de people were buying plaquenil in tons from the drugstore. Avec "La Provence" ce mardi : métiers d'art, un patrimoine toujours vivant ! The paper, published on 14 April, concludes against the use of hydroxychloroquine on COVID-19 hypoxic pneumonia patients and mentions: “Eight patients receiving HCQ (9.5%) experienced electrocardiogram modifications requiring HCQ discontinuation.“. You therefore have nothing scientifical in your approach as well. The French newspaper Entreprendre cited his letter to Robert Lafont, the CEO of this publishing house. In one patient, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were discontinued after 4 days because of a prolongation of the QT interval from 405 ms before treatment to 460 and 470 ms under the combination. Science journalism by Leonid Schneider, on research integrity and academic publishing in life sciences and biomedicine. ), which was never published anywhere, not even as preprint. You undermine your credibility with your extreme polemic personal attacks. Very serious,very,very serious .Stay “independent Cartoonist ” . As a reminder IFR = deaths / all infections (including the asymptomatics, undiagnosed etc.). So now Raoult endorses Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) as a chloroquine adjuvant. La vidéo a été réuploadée par France Soir, vous pouvez la voir à ce lien : sur France Soir n ous allons rapidement la télécharger sur de nouvelles plateformes d’hébergement « . The ones that are border-line are the one insulting a peer on a emotional basis, even sending death threats to him. Learn how your comment data is processed. My point is the timing of treatment is really big deal. On 20 April 2020, news came of Raoult being in serious legal trouble with the French authorities because of his human experiments with chloroquine: “The National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM), which did not authorize the second study on hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil *, Sanofi) conducted at the institute hospital-university (IHU) in Marseille by Pr Didier Raoult, awaits that the investigators bring objective elements to demonstrate its observational nature, indicated Dominique Martin in an interview with APMnews.”. Making huge profit out of this crisis by big pharma and their corrupted allies is the sole motive! just published a couple of days ago. That would be apples and oranges. That’s magic ! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1u7bETd3q9QVfO6y54jm_7Z5ZHTmoguUAetJHc2gwcj0/edit?usp=sharing. Tide is turning for the media-savvy French professor Didier Raoult and his chloroquine, even US President Donald Trump is suddenly barely even mentioning the miracle drug for COVID-19. ?Entre le pre-print est l'article publié, l'IHU a complètement revu la partie sur le comité d'éthique dans la première observationnelle. Pubmed as data on the Chinese invitro study of chloroquine. Because of Raoult, chloroquine became standard COVID-19 therapy in many countries worldwide. US rightwing politicians use this as a deliberate tactic. A retrospective study on 84 patients receiving hydroxychloroquine and azithromycine from New York University (Chorin et al medRxiv 2020) also demonstrated how serious those side effects in COVID-19 patients can be: “We report the change in the QT interval in 84 adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with Hydroxychloroquine/Azithromycin combination. Le fait, pour toute personne, de présenter à LaProvence.com un contenu ou activité comme illicite dans le but d'en obtenir le retrait ou d'en faire cesser He treated older patients who had clear symptoms, and few were subsequently hospitalized and almost none died. After dealing with Bik, Raoult tweeted his criticism about a study by his French colleagues in Paris and their study Mahevas et al medRxiv 2020. Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. The manuscript lists these key words: “SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; hydroxychloroquine; azithromycin; ethics; Hippocratic oath“. This horrendous ethics breach passed peer review at Elsevier with flying colours. I really don’t get this argument that “urgency of the situation excuses some of it”. Childs are going to be tested as well in a case of a pandemic, remember, we have to heal the people. Mais je peux vous dire et il faut arrêter, il faut regarder les livres médicaux, il faut regarder en maladies infectieuses combien il y a d’essais… combien il y a de thérapeutique qui sont utilisés actuellement qui ont été basées sur des essais randomisés et vous verrez, il y en a pas beaucoup et le peu qu’il y a étés en particulier pour le Sida et étaient totalement inutile parce qu’il suffisait de faire des charges virales. Now, the preprint by the Tongji cardiologist Wang Daowen and colleagues claims all 568 patients received “baseline treatments [..] of antiviral drugs (Lopinavir and Ritonavir, Entecavir hydrate, or Ribavirin)“. Les champs marqués d'un « * » sont obligatoires. Removing "death" from primary outcome is a surprising decision.https://t.co/ZnK9LiUzaX pic.twitter.com/Rq47FHqGyO. In that same video, Raoult is saying things which make less and less sense: “Maybe I was capable of responding to this situation because I’m part African and part of my ancestry leave me with the idea that we should treat infectious diseases“, Source: IHU Méditerranée-Infection – La leçon des épidémies courtes – 21 avril 2020 (https://t.co/s1D8zsWw53)@schneiderleonid @MicrobiomDigest @gorskon @Dereklowe @fxcoudertMore translation with more context and timestamps: pic.twitter.com/FrQKtQXTY0. Incidentally, by leaving France and Europe, he would escape any eventual criminal charges for illegal human experimentation. You mean BFM TV let people think he was a visionary. Practically, every country in the world monitors a number of active cases and death associated with COVID-19, and these statistics are updated several times daily. C’est que des gens qui dans les hôpitaux ont traités un peu comme ils voulaient qui a la fin on dit “regardez comment on compare”, donc il faut pas mettre les choses à l’envers, j’étais avant un grand scientifique et je suis resté un grand scientifique après avoir publié ça. In 1 day. Millions of people have been taking this drug for malaria in the past decades. Unlike his own clinical trials, Mahevas et al was really an observational study of 181 French COVID-19 patients treated after Raoult’s method, but with a control group. Bik blogged about that Brazilian “study”, where 636 patients, distance-assessed by telemedicine only, themselves decided which drug to take after they self-diagnosed themselves with COVID-19 (sic!). Instead, he lets his loyal bootlickers attack his critics. Ok, you don’t like the guy..you don’t like Trump…but it’s working, doctors have started using it and this pile of excrement you have written here will be forgoten and so will you! Not the one done by his US peers in the Veterans Affairs hospitals, that was a “fraudulent” and “fake news”. Well almost everything. study by a Brazilian insurance (sic! Its all the same. You mentioned above at ” Given the evidence that the coronavirus is apparently lethal for less than 1% of the infected……”. Politicians asking for an immediate solution to get people back to work asap in addition to damaged health systems in many countries, including the richest, already play a strongly negative role. This is not true. President’s Award for Outstanding Creative Activity, The Monsanto Papers: a wrong book on glyphosate, Towards equal opportunity for prostate, breast and ovarian cancers, Didier Raoult fraud: "Je ne regrette rien", Paolo Macchiarini indicted for aggravated assault in Sweden, Chloroquine genius Didier Raoult to save the world from COVID-19. That’s the difference here. He tweeted his YouTube video, saying that he prefers to have his studies assessed by “confined people” at his institute than by some external reviewers he cannot control: "Je reçois beaucoup de mails qui analysent les données disponibles, parfois de manière beaucoup plus profonde et professionnelle que dans les journaux scientifiques. Now Raoult, the 1-hour-peer review man, suddenly has enough of the traditional publishing he constantly games. The blame for thousands, if not millions, of covid-19 deaths will soon become abundantly clear being laid upon these two groups of ideoligists referenced above. Dirigé par le Pr. If you treat shingles after 48 hours Valcyclovir is not effective. see page 22 for data on patients (two 10 y/o children were included in the study) Read full articles, watch videos, browse thousands of titles and more on the "Didier Raoult" topic with Google News. Look at the data please. Since you seem French, you understand every word of what is sung by the students in the students’ performance video. Thats a big fat lie… only in marseille France were people were treated with chloroquine the rate of deaths was the lowest in France almost 0, people didn’t die in marseille were Dr Raoult treated them, but in rest of France they did and in marseille there is also no more new infections, the same in Greece, they also use the protocol and are fine, this article is just nonsense, it’s harassment and because of those bad articles people were miss informed and didn’t get treated. Wow… from the moment you confuse cloroquine with hydroxycloroquine, everything you have written becomes invalid. And what now? Raoult says this is good science. Raoult’s follow up clinical trial with 80 patients treated with chloroquine and azithromycine and without any control arm (criticised by Bik above) was published in a different Elsevier journal, and accepted the next day after submission. If you naively think such institutional fraud accusations happen in the scientific community at least occasionally: not really. You have many valid points against Raoult methodologies, although the urgency of the situation excuses some of it. Can you deny this man is so hated that students who do not have a carrier yet are not afraid to go public on what it means to work in his institute? But what about the treatment itself? Where the extra 158 patients and the HCQ group came from, is anyone’s guess, unless invented they were borrowed from different trials or hospitals. Dear Owlbert, please share your visual analysis! In 14 patients with paired samples, respiratory secretion at day 4 was negative in only one patient.”. Really, he does: First paper showing a significant effect of hydroxychloroquine on the fatality rate of severe forms of COVID-19.Attenuation of the inflammatory cytokine storm? Given the evidence that the coronavirus is apparently lethal for less than 1% of the infected, you can see where this is going. HCQ works. He also teaches infectious diseases in the Faculty of Medicine of Aix-Marseille University. Connectez-vous pour réagir à cet article. Scientists generally understand that and it is acceptable in urgent situations. Vladimir Poutine s'autorise à faire deux mandats de plus, Contrôle Covid à Marseille : "La pinte la plus chère de tous les temps", Une Marseillaise nous fera entrer chez Gainsbourg. Outside of Raoult’s alternative reality, clinical data from France, Sweden, Brazil and USA already now shows that chloroquine not only does not work against COVID-19, it seems to even kill. Raoult doesn’t talk about that study. He namely attacked the data integrity expert Elisabeth Bik, on Twitter and in full Trump manner: The witchhunter @MicrobiomDigest is not attentive to details when she judges that a study is useful to her paranoiac fights! Novartis to sponsor large-scale clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized COVID-19 patients #COVID19 #coronavirus #NovartisNews. ISAC (and then the publisher Elsevier) insist however that the peer review process “did adhere to the industry’s peer review rules.” Which is strange, since it seems the paper was reviewed and sent back for minor revision on the same day it was submitted. No wonder that the grand old man, unused to being contradicted or ridiculed, is losing it. 25/02/2020 – “Before we can influence mortality statistics in France, things will have to change a lot” in his “Coronavirus: a risk of pandemic?” video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuE5CA6yB-Y), I could also quote him on his “visions” about the climate but it’s out of his scope of proficiency. The first author of the new Gautret et al TMID 2020, Philippe Gautret, is incidentally associate editor of that of that journal. Raoult is right. We need to prevent the Cytokine storm. Those which do not fit his general world view, are all flawed or outright fraudulent. source : https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Hydroxychloroquine_final_DOI_IJAA.pdf It cannot be “quite illegal”. I look forward to seeing their paper once it is published. In many countries, the mortality rate is >10%, This is lethality and not mortality, so learn first and talk later. but why, oh why, you didn’t make clinical trial worthy of its name from the start, that could answer permanently Yes or No, the HCQ has effects, why did you keep in your niche paper … I know all your studies on Rickettsies, I know all your studies on maxivirus etc so I know your science well established, you knew very well that by publishing those “pseudo” trial, “pseudo clinical trial”, there were not acceptable by anyone, when we end up on a publication with 6 patients (he had 23, perhaps 6 in one group), we know very well that this i not a clinical trial, so why did you not do this clinical trial, it all bothers us” … You can see where it’s going”, The answer, I’ll let you translate it yourself though google, this is the word for word answer of Raoult on why he didn’t do a “clinical trial worthy of its name”: (added words to ease translation in parenthesis). https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202005.0057/v1, “It should be noted that while Raoult’s IHU hospital in Marseille boasts a very low COVID-19 mortality rate of 1.7% (while refusing to treat the very ill) it is still higher than the estimate for the rest of France which is 0.53% according to this study from Institut Pasteur. And Raoult is completely right. One in Italy tweeted yesterday that only 20 patients out of 65,000 users contracted Covid in Italy. About Dr Barraud alias fluidloading (which never denied to be Dr Barraud), here is most of his attacks on Pr Raoult, look at this link, http://www.noelshack.com/2020-17-3-1587558555-r-barraud.png. This is why chloroquine proponents changed their stance and now scream that it is wrong to treat very sick COVID-19 patients with chloroquine. The side effects of HCQ are ridiculous. The retrospective controlled clinical study found out that hydroxychloroquine-treated patients had a high risk of death and concluded: “In this study, we found no evidence that use of hydroxychloroquine, either with or without azithromycin, reduced the risk of mechanical ventilation in patients hospitalized with Covid-19. And in the last study, he had 8 deaths out of 1061 patients, 0.75% is a bit more but it included 474 co-morbidities, you can’t tell that it’s only the easy cases. Somehow Raoult’s Marseille buddy Jean-Paul Moatti managed to smuggle an opinion piece into The Lancet promoting chloroquine. Astounding, right? On 14 April 2020, Raoult’s IHU Marseille openly and publicly threatened a clinician Damien Barraud, who has been very critical of their chloroquine “studies” on Twitter and in newspaper interviews. If somebody has a hint that something might be working based on observation, then it should be presented that way. When you spend so much time admiring Trump, you start sounding like your idol. This medicin is approved for people with lupus and reuma. C’est en tout cas ce qu’affirme Didier Raoult dans un entretien avec la chaîne de télévision i24NEWS. Have you read Dr. Magagnoli et al’s study on outcomes of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 patients in the VA and checked whether Dr. Raoult’s criticisms of it are valid? 7 were here. When the time comes to discuss research financing, what will the taxpayers remember of that story? HCQ works like Tamiflu for the flu. Abonnez-vous I took it. Not a fan of Raoult at all but it is unfair to compare the mortality rate in his studies to the estimated infection fatality rate (0.53%) as the latter is necessarily much lower. Control group was treated with azithromycin.Nearly dying patients with lymphopenia were treated with hydroxychloroquine.Fraudulent study. As it happened, Raoult’s most recent (literally) uncontrolled clinical trials were ethically approved by his own submissive IHU. And while we’re at it, the author doesn’t seem to understand that chloroquine is not the same as HCQ. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Unfortunately a (supposed) lie can’t be fought with another lie, but with the truth. The highest level of evidence is Raoult’s own Gautret et al IJAA 2020 paper, plus two studies from China which don’t even fit. Fake news. see page 6 for inclusion criteria : “two primary criteria: i) age >12 years;” Do check the references here. Meanwhile, in USA, an NIH Expert Panel, convened by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (directed by US epidemics expert Anthony Fauci), recommended in its COVID-19 guidelines on 21 April 2020: “Except in the context of a clinical trial, the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) recommends against the use of the following drugs for the treatment of COVID-19: – The combination of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (AIII) because of the potential for toxicities.”. There are many other errors in your paper, dear Leonid. He even treated 14 year old children with chloroquine as part of his 1000 patients trial (Table 1 here, recruitment age was >12 years old), which is actually quite illegal. You need to use Tamiflu withing 48 hours of your influenza infection or else it is useless. Citizens For Responsible Care and Research (CIRCARE), Follow For Better Science on WordPress.com. 🔔 Go to the IHU Mediterranean Infection YouTube channel to watch the latest scientific bulletin from Pr Raoult. Raoult was possibly made to resign his job, he was cited to go to China already this summer. Predictably so, since the drug’s side effects are well known. Découvrez nos offres, Aix : leur métier, nettoyeurs... de scènes de crime. The description in the Table doesn't fit with a severe ARDS as only 1/2 patients were on mechanical ventilation ???? Regarding the Mahevas study in Medrxiv.Could the authors explain why 8 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine were counted in the control group? In this double-blinded phase IIb clinical trial, all patients were treated just as Raoult says, with hydroxychloroquine+azithromycine only, without those evil controls Raoult hates?

Partir La-bas Karaoke, Musique Film Lamour C'est Mieux à Deux, Girondins De Bordeaux En Direct, Serge Moati Odette Moati, Ol - Asse Historique, You And I Lyrics Delegation, Dream On Guitare Acoustique, Killing Eve Saison 4 2021, Isabelle Adjani Famille,

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.